@Namrata and everyone, if our shared vision has already been established as "spreading awareness about online teaching/learning", great! I happen to agree with that and will assume the majority of the WiZiQ community agree with this notion as well. Perhaps I missed this declaration in some other post which is certainly possible.
Now, in order to achieve this shared vision, you bring up the idea that WiZiQ ought to be considered a "teaching or learning hub" in posing the question:
"How do we direct attention of the millions of people who visit it [WiZiQ] once and forget about it, or those who are completely unaware of this concept?"
It's a good question and one that perhaps others have asked themselves as well. However, I would like to modify this question to one which I humbly believe is a bit more relevant:
"How do [teachers] direct [the] attention of millions of people who visit [teachers online] once and forget about [them], or those [learners] who are completely unaware of this concept [that learning can occur online]?"
Notice how I've shifted the focus from WiZiQ to teachers. My whole premise is that we should not set out to create WiZiQ as the central “teaching or learning hub", or presume that it is some prerequisite for reaching learners online. If this ends up happening for some teachers/learners, great! But this will have been the result of some relationship or dynamic between teacher and student that worked at the class level, factoring in the following: the teacher's personal teaching style and preference, the students' individual learning preference, needs, and interests, the size of the class, the level of diversification (i.e., level of choice students have with regard to content, process, and product creation), the time of day the class is being offered, etc. And this just deals with the synchronous part of online learning…we haven't even dealt with the asynchronous part.
My point is that learning is a complex system that occurs at many different levels. You mention that you agree with using Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, etc. to “spread the word", and I assume you mean to spread the notion of online education. But this emphasizes my point as well. I think we all agree that online learning requires using some mix of online websites, just as those previously mentioned. So, is it reasonable to suspect that the WiZiQ community can come up with concrete answers to the following questions:
1. How much of my teaching/learning should originate solely from WiZiQ?
2. What percentage of my teaching/learning should come from WiZiQ, Facebook, Ning, YouTube, etc.?
Do we agree that addressing these questions in a prescriptive way is counterproductive? If so, I would say the same idea extents to prescribing ways to conduct a WiZiQ class because again, the act of learning is simply too complex.
I think it boils down to language. If you are representing a consensus when you state the shared vision of WiZiQ as “spreading awareness about online teaching/learning", I'm all for it. I´m all for “joining hands" and sharing experiences, thoughts, and beliefs regarding how to improve online teaching/learning (notice I'm not mentioning only WiZiQ). If this leads to encouraging all WiZiQ stakeholders to lead and learn within the community, then we have reached a goal I am particularly fond of.
Good example of collaboration:
Tom shares an experience of what worked in a WiZiQ class. Dick shares ways of integrating different websites, platforms, etc. in order to create a more diversified learning experience with his learners. And Harry shows how a prior WiZiQ was a failure. All three communicate with each other and offer personal opinions regarding online teaching/learning.
Not-so-good example of members trying to reach a “common" end or goal within the WiZiQ community:
Tom shares an experience of what worked in a WiZiQ class. Dick shares ways of integrating different websites, platforms, etc. in order to create a more diversified learning experience with his learners. And Harry shows how a prior WiZiQ was a failure. [Notice the difference here.] All three communicate with each other in an effort to reach a consensus on what constitutes best practices when it comes to online teaching and learning, specifically when using WiZiQ. These best practices then become associated with the entire WiZiQ community.
The first example I mention is more “networked" while the second example is more “group" related. If we were a football team, perhaps the latter example would be recommended. But I don't see education (i.e., teaching and learning) working the same as a sports team, a business, or governmental agency. It's more “networked" in that yes reaching a consensus is an important subskill, but it's more about individuals achieving personal goals. It's about celebrating diversity much more than one would suspect when playing for the Dallas Cowboys, working at Microsoft, or working for the Justice Department.
Possible goal for WiZiQ:
The goal for teachers and learners within the WiZiQ community is to guarantee that everyone has the opportunity, authority, and support to lead and learn in an online educational environment.
It's my belief that if we focus on the above goal, that personal endeavors (e.g., financial rewards, personal gratification, etc.) will have a greater rate of succeeding.